Call For A Consultation 855-997-7522
Light Bulbs
  • Case Dismissed
    Plaintiff alleged that he developed asbestosis as a result of occupational exposure to asbestos-containing products during his employment as a laborer and insulator between 1969 and the 1980's. Plaintiff dismissed P&S client, a manufacturer of fibrous adhesive, for a mutual waiver of costs after P&S filed a Motion for Undertaking of Costs.
     
  • Case Dismissed
    Plaintiffs alleged their decedent developed acute myelogenous leukemia as a result of occupational exposures to benzene while working as a printer. Plaintiffs dismissed P&S client, manufacturer of inks, for a mutual waiver of costs.
  • Case Dismissed
    Plaintiffs allege that their decedent died from complications arising from mesothelioma, as a result of alleged exposure to asbestos containing products during his career. Plaintiffs dismissed P&S Client, a distributor of thermal products, for a waiver of costs.
  • Case Dismissed
    Plaintiff alleged that he developed mesothelioma as a result of occupational exposure to asbestos-containing products during his employment as janitor between the 1960s and 1980s. Plaintiffs dismissed P&S Client, a manufacturer of boilers, for a mutual waiver of costs.
     
  • Obtained Favorable Ruling
    Plaintiffs contended that decedent developed non-Hodgkins lymphoma (large B-cell lymphoma) as a result of exposures to benzene as a vehicle inspections officer with the California Highway Patrol between 1984 and 2009. Trial court sustained, without leave to amend, P&S Client, a manufacturer of a brakes and parts cleaner, demurrer on statute of limitations grounds (on appeal).
     
  • Case Dismissed
    Plaintiffs alleged that their decedent sustained interstitial pulmonary fibrosis as a result of exposure to various respiratory particulates, including silica, sand, metal, and chemical products, while employed at a light pole production facility between 1973 and 2008. Plaintiffs dismissed P&S Client, a supplier of cement dyes, for a waiver of costs.
  • Case Dismissed
    Plaintiffs alleged that their decedent died of mesothelioma due to his exposure to asbestos containing products while he served in the U.S. Navy. Plaintiffs dismissed P&S client for mutual waiver of costs after P&S insisted that plaintiffs comply with district court general orders in identifying particular witnesses against P&S client.
  • Case Dismissed
    Plaintiff contended that he developed small cell lymphocytic lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) as a result of occupational exposures to benzene when he operated a screen printing business between 1991 and 2000. Plaintiffs dismissed P&S Clien, a manufacturer of paint thinner, lacquer thinner, and acetone for a de minimis payment.
     
  • Pierson v. Philips Medical Systems (July 19, 2011, B221488) [nonpub. opn.]
    Affirmed summary judgment in favor of P&S client in a product liability/medical device matter after P&S demonstrated a lack of evidence supporting Plaintiff’s claims.
     
  • Successful Defense Verdict
    Plaintiff alleged that he sustained lung disease (interstitial pulmonary fibrosis) as a result of occupational exposure to respiratory particulates while working in an automotive repair body shop. A jury returned a defense verdict on behalf of P&S client, a manufacturer of automotive sprays and adhesives.
  • Case Dismissed
    Plaintiff brought a subrogation claim for damages paid to insured and third parties in connection with a soybean oil spill in the Long Beach area. Plaintiff alleged that P&S client was negligent as the distributor of the soybean oil. Plaintiff dismissed P&S client for a mutual waiver of costs after it was shown plaintiff would not be likely to prove negligence at trial.
  • Case Dismissed
    Plaintiff alleged that he contracted pleural plaques and pleural thickening from exposure to asbestos and asbestos containing products while working at various land-based employment locations. Plaintiff dismissed P&S client for a mutual waiver of costs based upon P&S filed a motion for summary judgment.