Articles

The Top Verdicts of 2013 You Should Have Heard About But Didn’t

With the avalanche of news in our modern lives, even non-lawyers are overwhelmed with information about big trial verdicts. If you are a Dodgers fan, you likely heard about the contentious divorce of former owner, Frank McCourt who settled with his now ex-wife for a cool $130 million plus assets. And many watched the trial brought by singer Michael Jackson's family against his concert promoter AEG Live for wrongful death, which resulted in a defense verdict for AEG. However, there were some extraordinary trial verdicts that didn't attract the media's attention and yet will have a huge impact on future litigation. Here are just a sampling of the top verdicts in California from 2013 that you should have heard about but didn't.

Asam v. Ortiz (Santa Clarita Superior Court Case No. PC051705)

In 2009, Michael Asam and his family, including three children were traveling to Oregon when their SUV left the highway and collided with a parked semi-trailer. Michael, his wife, and his oldest child perished in the catastrophic accident. At trial it was determined the driver of the semi-trailer did not have any lights on and should have parked off the highway, as the area he parked was reserved for emergencies. Though the jury found both Asam and the truck driver negligent, the jury still awarded $150 million dollars in damages to Asam's remaining family. This was a stunning award in light of the finding of comparative negligence. As of the writing of this article, the verdict had been vacated as excessive and it appears a new trial will be ordered.

Antonick v. Electronic Arts ("EA")(U.S. District Ct., Northern Dist. of California No. 11-1543)

Web Developer, Robin Antonick brought suit against his former employer, EA for failing to compensate him for use of his source code in the popular video game, John Madden football. Antonick had toiled for years designing the first Madden game and then left EA. It was not until much later Antonick realized EA was still using his code without paying him royalties. The federal jury awarded Antonick $3.6 million to compensate him for each of the annual editions of the game up to 1996. It was an interesting verdict in light of the issues with delay in Antonick bringing his lawsuit. Since the verdict, the Court has reversed the judgment in favor of EA and there is a possibility of appeal by Antonick.

Name.space. Inc. v. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ("ICANN")(U.S. District Ct., Central Dist. of California No. 12-8676)

Name.space sued ICANN, a non-profit that oversees the issuances of domain names for websites. Name.space alleged ICANN was abusing its monopoly to constrain competition in new domains. In a bench trial, the U.S. District judge rejected Name.space's complaint. The Court held that ICANN's monopoly was given to it by the U.S. government and not through ICANN's "willful acquisition" of the monopoly.

Environmental Law Foundation v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp. (Alameda Superior Court Case No. RG11597384)

Beech-Nut, along with other related defendants including Del Monte Foods faced a lawsuit brought under California's Proposition 65 alleging their fruit juice, baby food, and canned foods contained unsafe levels of lead. Defendant Environmental Law Foundation requested an assessment of civil penalties in the amount of $2,500 per day for each violation, which if granted could have totaled in the billions of dollars. Typically, defendants settle these types of cases due to the high burden on defendants to prove their products are within legal limits. However, Beech-Nut decided to risk trial, as it felt strongly that its products were safe and actually beneficial to consumer's health. Their risk paid off. In a battle of the experts on how to measure lead in the products, the judge agreed with Beech-Nut and dismissed the entire action. Environmental Law Foundation has filed an appeal.

  • Extensive Business Knowledge
    Regardless of the complexity of your case, you can trust that your legal matters will be in competent hands when you turn to Poole Shaffery.
  • Proven Track Record
    Our team of accomplished business attorneys has consistently delivered positive outcomes for our clients, resolving complex business matters with skill and expertise.
  • Experience and Reputation
    Poole Shaffery boasts a team of Santa Clarita business attorneys with strong reputations among judges and fellow lawyers, including AV Preeminent® rated professionals and Super Lawyers® honorees.

Contact Our Firm

We’re Here to Listen
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy